By: john in cheshire
I thought Eric Pickles was going to put a stop to this troughing of our money by our servants. When will he start doing that, do we know?
View ArticleBy: APA
We hesitate to let the facts stand in the way of a good argument but just for the record: 1 . The APA does not receive a grant from the Home Office 2. Our Council has 60, not 80 members 3. Our Board...
View ArticleBy: Dave
The APA response raises significant issues regarding the accuracy of TPA’s original piece. I would have anticipated some response from Mr Allison on the numerical discrepancies. However, APA’s claims...
View ArticleBy: andrew_allison
Sorry for the delay in getting back to you. In your Annual Report for 2009/10 (the most recent one on your website) it states in y/e 31 March 2009 the APA received a Home Office grant of £155,000, and...
View ArticleBy: Dave
It concerns me greatly when there is disagreement over what ought to be simply confirmed data. I had originally been impressed by the clarity of APA’s response, but Mr Allison’s response now appears to...
View ArticleBy: Taxpayer
Andrew, thanks for taking us through the steps of your research. It’s good to know that 18 people had a photograph and one didn’t. And that at least you and the APA both agree that 19-2=17. Really...
View ArticleBy: Hadenuff
John, I’m afraid that Eric Pickles has turned out to be more of a Wilfred Pickles (if you can remember back that far) – give ‘em the money, Mabel!
View ArticleBy: Jameshughes
I am absolutely incensed that the taxpayer has to pay, and I care not a jot whether it was £1 or a penny, for the elite of the police to be members of a an organisation or old boys club. I am a member...
View ArticleBy: andrew_allison
By the time I was writing that part of the comment, I was attempting to be sarcastic. My apologies if I failed, but I don’t think two fewer board members make a difference. The point is I was accused...
View Article
